LAN-Schwäche?
Also, ich habe bei meinem letzen ping ... - t bemerkt dass ich eine solche Antwort hier bei mir zuhause bekomme.
Was soll die -4 bedeuten? Ist das normal? Sollte es nicht sogut wie immer <1ms sein?
Zu erwähnen ist aber dass ich sehr viele Programme mit LAN-Zugriff am laufen habe und nur auf einem 100 MBit Switch hänge.
Was ist aber nun der Normalbereich?
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Windows XP Sp2
Ping geht auf einen Speedtouch
-->Product Name: SpeedTouch 5x6
-->Board Name: BANT-J
Das System ist zudem neu aufgelegt und rein wie ein Babypo
Was soll die -4 bedeuten? Ist das normal? Sollte es nicht sogut wie immer <1ms sein?
Zu erwähnen ist aber dass ich sehr viele Programme mit LAN-Zugriff am laufen habe und nur auf einem 100 MBit Switch hänge.
Was ist aber nun der Normalbereich?
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time=-4ms TTL=64
Reply from 192.168.1.254: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
Windows XP Sp2
Ping geht auf einen Speedtouch
-->Product Name: SpeedTouch 5x6
-->Board Name: BANT-J
Das System ist zudem neu aufgelegt und rein wie ein Babypo
Please also mark the comments that contributed to the solution of the article
Content-Key: 83250
Url: https://administrator.de/contentid/83250
Printed on: April 23, 2024 at 22:04 o'clock
1 Comment